<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.the-cryosphere.net/inc/tc/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>The Cryosphere</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.the-cryosphere.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1994-0416</issn>
		<eissn>1994-0424</eissn>
		<volume_number>2</volume_number>
		<issue_number>2</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2008</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/tc-2-95-2008</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.the-cryosphere.net/2/95/2008/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.the-cryosphere.net/2/95/2008/tc-2-95-2008.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.the-cryosphere.net/2/95/2008/tc-2-95-2008.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>95</start_page>
	<end_page>108</end_page>
	<publication_date>2008-08-26</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Benchmark experiments for higher-order and full-Stokes ice sheet models (ISMIP–HOM)</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>F. Pattyn</name>
			<email>fpattyn@ulb.ac.be</email>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>L. Perichon</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="2">
			<name>A. Aschwanden</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="4" affiliations="3">
			<name>B. Breuer</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="5" affiliations="4">
			<name>B. de Smedt</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="6" affiliations="5">
			<name>O. Gagliardini</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="7" affiliations="6">
			<name>G. H. Gudmundsson</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="8" affiliations="6">
			<name>R. C. A. Hindmarsh</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="9" affiliations="7">
			<name>A. Hubbard</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="10" affiliations="8">
			<name>J. V. Johnson</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="11" affiliations="3">
			<name>T. Kleiner</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="12" affiliations="9">
			<name>Y. Konovalov</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="13" affiliations="6">
			<name>C. Martin</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="14" affiliations="10">
			<name>A. J. Payne</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="15" affiliations="11">
			<name>D. Pollard</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="16" affiliations="10">
			<name>S. Price</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="17" affiliations="3">
			<name>M. Rückamp</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="18" affiliations="12">
			<name>F. Saito</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="19" affiliations="13">
			<name>O. Souček</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="20" affiliations="14">
			<name>S. Sugiyama</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="21" affiliations="15">
			<name>T. Zwinger</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Laboratoire de Glaciologie, Université Libre de Bruxelles, CP160/03, Av. F. Roosevelt 50, 1050 Brussels, Belgium</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, Universitaetstrasse 16, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="3" content_type="html">Institute for Geophysics, University of Muenster, Corrensstrasse 24, 48149 Muenster, Germany</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="4" content_type="html">Vakgroep Geografie, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="5" content_type="html">Laboratoire de Glaciologie et de Géophysique de l&apos;Environnement (LGGE), CNRS, UJF-Grenoble I, BP 96, 38402 Saint Martin d&apos;Hères Cedex, France</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="6" content_type="html">Physical Science Division, British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="7" content_type="html">Centre for Glaciology, Institute of Geography and Earth Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Ceredigion, SY23 3DP, UK</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="8" content_type="html">Department of Computer Science, Social Science Building Room 417, Univ. of Montana, Missoula MT, 59812-5256, USA</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="9" content_type="html">Moscow Engineering Physics Institute, Moscow, Russia</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="10" content_type="html">Bristol Glaciology Centre, School of Geographical Sciences, University Road, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1SS, UK</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="11" content_type="html">Earth and Environmental Systems Institute, College of Earth and Mineral Sciences, 2217 Earth-Engineering Sciences Bldg., Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="12" content_type="html">Frontier Res. Center for Global Change, 3173-25 Showamachi, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama City, Kanagawa 236-0001, Japan</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="13" content_type="html">Department of Geophysics, Charles University Prague, V. Holešovičkách 2, 18000 Praha 8, Czech Republic</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="14" content_type="html">Institute of Low Temperature Science, Hokkaido University, Nishi-8, Kita-19, Sapporo 060-0819, Japan</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="15" content_type="html">CSC-Scientific Computing Ltd., Keilaranta 14, P.O. Box 405, 02101 Espoo, Finland</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">We present the results of the first ice sheet model intercomparison project
for higher-order and full-Stokes ice sheet models. These models are compared
and verified in a series of six experiments of which one has an analytical
solution obtained from a perturbation analysis. The experiments are applied
to both 2-D and 3-D geometries; five experiments are steady-state diagnostic,
and one has a time-dependent prognostic solution. All participating models
give results that are in close agreement. A clear distinction can be made
between higher-order models and those that solve the full system of
equations. The full-Stokes models show a much smaller spread, hence are in
better agreement with one another and with the analytical solution.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> Blatter, H.: Velocity and stress fields in grounded glaciers: a simple algorithm for including deviatoric stress gradients, J. Glaciol., 41, 333–344, 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Blatter, H., Clarke, G., and Colinge, J.: Stress and velocity fields in glaciers: Part II. sliding and basal stress distribution, J. Glaciol., 44, 457–466, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> Breuer, B., Lange, M., and Blindow, N.: Sensitivity studies on model modifications to assess the dynamics of a temperate ice cap, such as that on King George Island, Antarctica, J. Glaciol., 52, 235–247, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Colinge, J. and Rappaz, J.: A strongly nonlinear problem arising in glaciology, Mathem. Modelling Numer. Analysis, 33, 395–406, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> Gagliardini, O. and Zwinger, T.: The ISMIP–HOM benchmark experiments performed using the Finite-Element code Elmer, The Cryosphere, 2, 67–76, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> Gudmundsson, G.: Transmission of basal variability to a glacier surface, J. Geophys. Res, 108(B5), 2253, doi:10.1029/2002JB002107, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> Gudmundsson, G.: Analytical solutions for the surface response to small amplitude perturbations in boundary data in the shallow-ice-stream approximation, The Cryosphere, 2, 77–93, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> Hindmarsh, R C. A.: A numerical comparison of approximations to the Stokes equations used in ice sheet and glacier modeling, J. Geophys. Res, 109, F01012, doi:10.1029/2003JF000065, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> Hindmarsh, R C. A.: The role of membrane-like stresses in determining the stability and sensitivity of the antarctic ice sheets: back pressure and grounding line motion, Phil. Trans. R. Soc., A, 1733–1767, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> Hubbard, A., Blatter, H., Nienow, P., Mair, D., and Hubbard, B.: Comparison of a three-dimensional model for glacier flow with field data from Haut Glacier d&apos;Arolla, Switzerland, J. Glaciol., 44, 368–378, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> Hutter, K.: Theoretical Glaciology, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1983. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text"> Huybrechts, P., Payne, T., and The EISMINT Intercomparison Group: The EISMINT benchmarks for testing ice-sheet models, Ann. Glaciol., 23, 1–12, 1996. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text"> Huybrechts, P., Abe-Ouchi, A., Marsiat, I., Pattyn, F., Payne, T., Ritz, C., and Rommelaere, V.: Report of the Third EISMINT Workshop on Model Intercomparison, European Science Foundation (Strasbourg), 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text"> IPCC: Contribution of working group i to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, in: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis., edited by: Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K., Tignor, M., and Miller, H., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, p 996, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text"> Johnson, J. and Staiger, J.: Modeling long-term stability of the Ferrar Glacier, East Antarctica: Implications for interpreting cosmogenic nuclide inheritance, J. Geophys. Res., 112, F03S30, doi:10.1029/2006JF000599, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="16" content_type="text"> Ladyzhenskaya, O.: The Mathematical Theory of Viscous Incompressible Flow, New York, Gordon and Breach, 1969. </reference>
		<reference numeration="17" content_type="text"> MacAyeal, D.: Large-scale ice flow over a viscous basal sediment: Theory and application to Ice Stream B, Antarctica, J. Geophys. Res., 94, 4071–4087, 1989. </reference>
		<reference numeration="18" content_type="text"> MacAyeal, D.: A tutorial on the use of control methods in ice-sheet modeling, J. Glaciol., 39, 91–98, 1993. </reference>
		<reference numeration="19" content_type="text"> MacAyeal, D., Rommelaere, V., Huybrechts, P., Hulbe, C., Determann, J., and Ritz, C.: An ice-shelf model test based on the Ross ice shelf, Ann. Glaciol., 23, 46–51, 1996. </reference>
		<reference numeration="20" content_type="text"> Martin, C., Navarro, F., Otero, J., Cuadrado, M., and Corcuera, M.: Three-dimensional modelling of the dynamics of Johnson Glacier (Livingstone Island, Antarctica), Ann. Glaciol., 39, 1–8, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="21" content_type="text"> Nienow, P., Hubbard, A., Hubbard, B., Chandler, D., Mair, D., Sharp, M., and Willis, I.: Hydrological controls on diurnal ice flow variability in valley glaciers, J. Geophys. Res., 110, F04002, doi:10.1029/2003JF000112, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="22" content_type="text"> Pattyn, F.: Transient glacier response with a higher-order numerical ice-flow model, J. Glaciol., 48, 467–477, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="23" content_type="text"> Pattyn, F.: A new 3D higher-order thermomechanical ice-sheet model: Basic sensitivity, ice-stream development and ice flow across subglacial lakes, J. Geophys. Res., 108(B8), 2382, doi:10.1029/2002JB002329, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="24" content_type="text"> Pattyn, F.: Investigating the stability of subglacial lakes with a full Stokes ice-sheet model, J. Glaciol., 54, 353–361, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="25" content_type="text"> Payne, A., Huybrechts, P., Abe-Ouchi, A., Calov, R., Fastook, J., Greve, R., Marshall, S., Marsiat, I., Ritz, C., Tarasov, L., and Thomassen, M.: Results from the EISMINT model intercomparsion: the effects of thermomechanical coupling, J. Glaciol., 46, 227–238, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="26" content_type="text"> Pollard, D. and DeConto, R.: A coupled ice-sheet/ice-shelf/sediment model applied to a marine-margin flowline: Forced and unforced variations, in: International Association of Sedimentologists Special Publication, 39, 37–52, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="27" content_type="text"> Price, S., Waddington, E., and Conway, H.: A full-stress, thermomechanical flowband model using the finite volume method, J. Geophys. Res., 112, F03020, doi:10.1029/2006JF000724, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="28" content_type="text"> Raymond, M. and Gudmundsson, G.: On the relationship between surface and basal properties on glaciers, ice sheets, and ice streams, J. Geophys. Res., 110, B08411, doi:10.1029/2005JB003681, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="29" content_type="text"> Sugiyama, S., Gudmundsson, G., and Ebling, J.: Numerical investigation of the effects of temporal variations in basal lubrications on englacial strain-rate distribution, Ann. Glaciol., 37, 49–54, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="30" content_type="text"> Van der Veen, C. and Whillans, I.: Force budget: I. theory and numerical methods, J. Glaciol., 35, 53–60, 1989. </reference>
		<reference numeration="31" content_type="text"> Zwinger, T., Greve, R., Gagliardini, O., Shiraiwa, T., and Lyly, M.: A Full Stokes-flow thermo-mechanical model for firn and ice applied to the Gorshkov crater glacier, Kamchatka, Ann. Glaciol., 45, 29–37, 2007. </reference>
	</references>
</article>

