Articles | Volume 10, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-2191-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-2191-2016
Research article
 | 
22 Sep 2016
Research article |  | 22 Sep 2016

Mechanism of seasonal Arctic sea ice evolution and Arctic amplification

Kwang-Yul Kim, Benjamin D. Hamlington, Hanna Na, and Jinju Kim

Related authors

Understanding the Mechanism of Arctic Amplification and Sea Ice Loss
Kwang-Yul Kim, Jinju Kim, Saerim Yeo, Hanna Na, Benjamin D. Hamlington, and Robert R. Leben
The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2017-39,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2017-39, 2017
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary

Related subject area

Sea Ice
Analysis of microseismicity in sea ice with deep learning and Bayesian inference: application to high-resolution thickness monitoring
Ludovic Moreau, Léonard Seydoux, Jérôme Weiss, and Michel Campillo
The Cryosphere, 17, 1327–1341, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1327-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-1327-2023, 2023
Short summary
A collection of wet beam models for wave–ice interaction
Sasan Tavakoli and Alexander V. Babanin
The Cryosphere, 17, 939–958, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-939-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-939-2023, 2023
Short summary
First results of Antarctic sea ice type retrieval from active and passive microwave remote sensing data
Christian Melsheimer, Gunnar Spreen, Yufang Ye, and Mohammed Shokr
The Cryosphere, 17, 105–126, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-105-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-105-2023, 2023
Short summary
Modelling the evolution of Arctic multiyear sea ice over 2000–2018
Heather Christine Regan, Pierre Rampal, Einar Ólason, Guillaume Boutin, and Anton Korosov
The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2022-211,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2022-211, 2022
Revised manuscript accepted for TC
Short summary
Linking scales of sea ice surface topography: evaluation of ICESat-2 measurements with coincident helicopter laser scanning during MOSAiC
Robert Ricker, Steven Fons, Arttu Jutila, Nils Hutter, Kyle Duncan, Sinead L. Farrell, Nathan T. Kurtz, and Renée Mie Fredensborg Hansen
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1122,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1122, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Årthun, M. and Eldevik, T.: On Anomalous Ocean Heat Transport toward the Arctic and Associated Climate Predictability, J. Climate, 29, 689–704, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0448.1, 2016.
Årthun, M., Eldevik, T., Smedsrud, L. H., Skagseth, Ø., and Ingvaldsen, R. B.: Quantifying the Influence of Atlantic Heat on Barents Sea Ice Variability and Retreat, J. Climate, 25, 4736–4743, 2012.
Boé, J., Hall, A., and Qu, X.: September sea-ice cover in the Arctic Ocean projected to vanish by 2100, Nat. Geosci., 2, 341–343, 2009a.
Boé, J., Hall, A., and Qu, X.: Current GCMs' unrealistic negative feedback in the Arctic, J. Climate, 22, 4682–4695, 2009b.
Cavalieri, D. J. and Parkinson, C. L.: Arctic sea ice variability and trends, 1979–2010, The Cryosphere, 6, 881–889, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-6-881-2012, 2012.
Download
Short summary
Analysis reveals that “Arctic amplification”, lower tropospheric winter temperature rise in the Arctic, is due to sea ice melting and the resulting increase in the amount of turbulent heat flux from the ocean. As a result of increased turbulent heat flux, lower atmosphere warms up, resulting in increased downward longwave radiation. A detailed physical mechanism is presented together with an explanation why this positive feedback process is currently possible in the Barents–Kara seas.