Articles | Volume 10, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-2217-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-2217-2016
Research article
 | 
26 Sep 2016
Research article |  | 26 Sep 2016

The impact of melt ponds on summertime microwave brightness temperatures and sea-ice concentrations

Stefan Kern, Anja Rösel, Leif Toudal Pedersen, Natalia Ivanova, Roberto Saldo, and Rasmus Tage Tonboe

Related authors

Mapping of sea ice concentration using the NASA NIMBUS 5 Electrically Scanning Microwave Radiometer data from 1972–1977
Wiebke Margitta Kolbe, Rasmus T. Tonboe, and Julienne Stroeve
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 1247–1264, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-1247-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-1247-2024, 2024
Short summary
The AutoICE Challenge
Andreas R. Stokholm, Jørgen Buus-Hinkler, Tore Wulf, Anton Korosov, Roberto Saldo, Leif T. Pedersen, David Arthurs, Ionut Dragan, Iacopo Modica, Juan Pedro, Annekatrien Debien, Xinwei Chen, Muhammed Patel, Fernando J. P. Cantu, Javier N. Turnes, Jinman Park, Linlin Xu, Andrea K. Scott, David A. Clausi, Yuan Fang, Mingzhe Jiang, Saeid Taleghanidoozdoozan, Neil C. Brubacher, Armina Soleymani, Zacharie Gousseau, Michał Smaczny, Patryk Kowalski, Jacek Komorowski, David Rijlaarsdam, Jan N. van Rijn, Jens Jakobsen, Martin S. J. Rogers, Nick Hughes, Tom Zagon, Rune Solberg, Nicolas Longépé, and Matilde B. Kreiner
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2648,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2648, 2023
Short summary
Wind redistribution of snow impacts the Ka- and Ku-band radar signatures of Arctic sea ice
Vishnu Nandan, Rosemary Willatt, Robbie Mallett, Julienne Stroeve, Torsten Geldsetzer, Randall Scharien, Rasmus Tonboe, John Yackel, Jack Landy, David Clemens-Sewall, Arttu Jutila, David N. Wagner, Daniela Krampe, Marcus Huntemann, Mallik Mahmud, David Jensen, Thomas Newman, Stefan Hendricks, Gunnar Spreen, Amy Macfarlane, Martin Schneebeli, James Mead, Robert Ricker, Michael Gallagher, Claude Duguay, Ian Raphael, Chris Polashenski, Michel Tsamados, Ilkka Matero, and Mario Hoppmann
The Cryosphere, 17, 2211–2229, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2211-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2211-2023, 2023
Short summary
Rain on snow (ROS) understudied in sea ice remote sensing: a multi-sensor analysis of ROS during MOSAiC (Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate)
Julienne Stroeve, Vishnu Nandan, Rosemary Willatt, Ruzica Dadic, Philip Rostosky, Michael Gallagher, Robbie Mallett, Andrew Barrett, Stefan Hendricks, Rasmus Tonboe, Michelle McCrystall, Mark Serreze, Linda Thielke, Gunnar Spreen, Thomas Newman, John Yackel, Robert Ricker, Michel Tsamados, Amy Macfarlane, Henna-Reetta Hannula, and Martin Schneebeli
The Cryosphere, 16, 4223–4250, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-4223-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-4223-2022, 2022
Short summary
Satellite passive microwave sea-ice concentration data set intercomparison using Landsat data
Stefan Kern, Thomas Lavergne, Leif Toudal Pedersen, Rasmus Tage Tonboe, Louisa Bell, Maybritt Meyer, and Luise Zeigermann
The Cryosphere, 16, 349–378, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-349-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-349-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Sea Ice
Why is summertime Arctic sea ice drift speed projected to decrease?
Jamie L. Ward and Neil F. Tandon
The Cryosphere, 18, 995–1012, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-995-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-995-2024, 2024
Short summary
Impact of atmospheric rivers on Arctic sea ice variations
Linghan Li, Forest Cannon, Matthew R. Mazloff, Aneesh C. Subramanian, Anna M. Wilson, and Fred Martin Ralph
The Cryosphere, 18, 121–137, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-121-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-121-2024, 2024
Short summary
The impacts of anomalies in atmospheric circulations on Arctic sea ice outflow and sea ice conditions in the Barents and Greenland seas: case study in 2020
Fanyi Zhang, Ruibo Lei, Mengxi Zhai, Xiaoping Pang, and Na Li
The Cryosphere, 17, 4609–4628, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-4609-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-4609-2023, 2023
Short summary
A large-scale high-resolution numerical model for sea-ice fragmentation dynamics
Jan Åström, Jari Haapala, and Arttu Polojärvi
The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2023-97,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2023-97, 2023
Preprint under review for TC
Short summary
Atmospheric highs drive asymmetric sea ice drift during lead opening from Point Barrow
MacKenzie E. Jewell, Jennifer K. Hutchings, and Cathleen A. Geiger
The Cryosphere, 17, 3229–3250, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-3229-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-3229-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Andersen, S., Tonboe, R. T., Kaleschke, L., Heygster, G., and Pedersen, L. T.: Intercomparison of passive microwave sea ice concentration retrievals over the high-concentration Arctic sea ice, J. Geophys. Res., 112, C08004, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JC003543, 2007.
Ashcroft, P. and Wentz, F. J.: AMSR-E/Aqua L2A global swath spatially-resampled brightness temperatures data set, version 3, [2009-06-01 to 2009-08-31], NASA DAAC at the National Snow and Ice Data Center, Boulder, Colorado, USA, https://doi.org/10.5067/AMSR-E/AE_L2A.003, 2013.
Baum, B. A., Menzel, W. P., Frey, R. A., Tobin, D. C., Holz, R. E., and Ackerman, S. A.: MODIS cloud-top property refinement for Collection 6, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 51, 1145–1163, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-11-0203.1, 2012.
Beitsch, A.: Uncertainties of a near 90 GHz sea ice concentration retrieval algorithm. Dissertationsschrift, Universität Hamburg, available at: http://ediss.sub.uni-hamburg.de/volltexte/2014/7070/pdf/Dissertation.pdf, last access: 2 June 2016, 2014.
Cavalieri, D. J., Gloersen, P., and Campbell, W. J.: Determination of sea ice parameters with the NIMBUS 7 SMMR, J. Geophys. Res., 89, 5355–5369, 1984.
Download
Short summary
Sea ice, frozen seawater floating on polar oceans, is covered by meltwater puddles, so-called melt ponds, during summer. Methods used to compute Arctic sea-ice concentration (SIC) from microwave satellite data are influenced by melt ponds. We apply eight such methods to one microwave dataset and compare SIC with visible data. We conclude all methods fail to distinguish melt ponds from leads between ice floes; SIC biases are negative (positive) for ponded (non-ponded) sea ice and can exceed 20 %.