Journal cover Journal topic
The Cryosphere An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 4.790 IF 4.790
  • IF 5-year value: 5.921 IF 5-year
    5.921
  • CiteScore value: 5.27 CiteScore
    5.27
  • SNIP value: 1.551 SNIP 1.551
  • IPP value: 5.08 IPP 5.08
  • SJR value: 3.016 SJR 3.016
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 63 Scimago H
    index 63
  • h5-index value: 51 h5-index 51
Volume 11, issue 4
The Cryosphere, 11, 1685–1689, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-1685-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
The Cryosphere, 11, 1685–1689, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-1685-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Comment/reply 21 Jul 2017

Comment/reply | 21 Jul 2017

Reply to “Basal buoyancy and fast-moving glaciers: in defense of analytic force balance” by C. J. van der Veen (2016)

Terence J. Hughes1,* Terence J. Hughes
  • 1Climate Change Institute and School of Earth and Climate Sciences University of Maine, 404 North Sixth Street, Fort Pierre, South Dakota 57532, USA
  • *retired

Abstract. Two approaches to ice-sheet modeling are available. Analytical modeling is the traditional approach (Van der Veen, 2016). It solves the force (momentum), mass, and energy balances to obtain three-dimensional solutions over time, beginning with the Navier–Stokes equations for the force balance. Geometrical modeling employs simple geometry to solve the force and mass balance in one dimension along ice flow (Hughes, 2012a). It is useful primarily to provide the first-order physical basis of ice-sheet modeling for students with little background in mathematics. The geometric approach uses changes in ice-bed coupling along flow to calculate changes in ice elevation and thickness, using a floating fraction ϕ along a flow line or flow band, where ϕ = 0 for sheet flow, 0 < ϕ < 1 for stream flow, and ϕ = 1 for shelf flow. An attempt is made to reconcile the two approaches.

Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
Two approaches to ice-sheet modeling are available. Analytical modeling is the traditional approach. It solves the force (momentum), mass, and energy balances to obtain three-dimensional solutions over time. Geometrical modeling employs simple geometry to solve the force and mass balance in one dimension along ice flow. It is useful primarily to provide the first-order physical basis of ice-sheet modeling for students with little background in mathematics. The two approaches are compared.
Two approaches to ice-sheet modeling are available. Analytical modeling is the traditional...
Citation