Journal cover Journal topic
The Cryosphere An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 4.790 IF 4.790
  • IF 5-year value: 5.921 IF 5-year
    5.921
  • CiteScore value: 5.27 CiteScore
    5.27
  • SNIP value: 1.551 SNIP 1.551
  • IPP value: 5.08 IPP 5.08
  • SJR value: 3.016 SJR 3.016
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 63 Scimago H
    index 63
  • h5-index value: 51 h5-index 51
Volume 11, issue 2
The Cryosphere, 11, 949–970, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-949-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
The Cryosphere, 11, 949–970, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-949-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 18 Apr 2017

Research article | 18 Apr 2017

How accurate are estimates of glacier ice thickness? Results from ITMIX, the Ice Thickness Models Intercomparison eXperiment

Daniel Farinotti et al.
Related authors  
Glacier runoff variations since 1955 in the Maipo River Basin, semiarid Andes of central Chile
Álvaro Ayala, David Farías-Barahona, Matthias Huss, Francesca Pellicciotti, James McPhee, and Daniel Farinotti
The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2019-233,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2019-233, 2019
Manuscript under review for TC
Short summary
Modelling the future evolution of glaciers in the European Alps under the EURO-CORDEX RCM ensemble
Harry Zekollari, Matthias Huss, and Daniel Farinotti
The Cryosphere, 13, 1125–1146, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-1125-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-1125-2019, 2019
Short summary
The European mountain cryosphere: a review of its current state, trends, and future challenges
Martin Beniston, Daniel Farinotti, Markus Stoffel, Liss M. Andreassen, Erika Coppola, Nicolas Eckert, Adriano Fantini, Florie Giacona, Christian Hauck, Matthias Huss, Hendrik Huwald, Michael Lehning, Juan-Ignacio López-Moreno, Jan Magnusson, Christoph Marty, Enrique Morán-Tejéda, Samuel Morin, Mohamed Naaim, Antonello Provenzale, Antoine Rabatel, Delphine Six, Johann Stötter, Ulrich Strasser, Silvia Terzago, and Christian Vincent
The Cryosphere, 12, 759–794, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-759-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-759-2018, 2018
Short summary
The bedrock topography of Gries- and Findelengletscher
Nadine Feiger, Matthias Huss, Silvan Leinss, Leo Sold, and Daniel Farinotti
Geogr. Helv., 73, 1–9, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-73-1-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-73-1-2018, 2018
Short summary
Re-establishing glacier monitoring in Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan, Central Asia
Martin Hoelzle, Erlan Azisov, Martina Barandun, Matthias Huss, Daniel Farinotti, Abror Gafurov, Wilfried Hagg, Ruslan Kenzhebaev, Marlene Kronenberg, Horst Machguth, Alexandr Merkushkin, Bolot Moldobekov, Maxim Petrov, Tomas Saks, Nadine Salzmann, Tilo Schöne, Yuri Tarasov, Ryskul Usubaliev, Sergiy Vorogushyn, Andrey Yakovlev, and Michael Zemp
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 6, 397–418, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-6-397-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-6-397-2017, 2017
Related subject area  
Numerical Modelling
Simulated retreat of Jakobshavn Isbræ during the 21st century
Xiaoran Guo, Liyun Zhao, Rupert M. Gladstone, Sainan Sun, and John C. Moore
The Cryosphere, 13, 3139–3153, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-3139-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-3139-2019, 2019
Wave energy attenuation in fields of colliding ice floes – Part 1: Discrete-element modelling of dissipation due to ice–water drag
Agnieszka Herman, Sukun Cheng, and Hayley H. Shen
The Cryosphere, 13, 2887–2900, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-2887-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-2887-2019, 2019
Short summary
Contrasting thinning patterns between lake- and land-terminating glaciers in the Bhutanese Himalaya
Shun Tsutaki, Koji Fujita, Takayuki Nuimura, Akiko Sakai, Shin Sugiyama, Jiro Komori, and Phuntsho Tshering
The Cryosphere, 13, 2733–2750, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-2733-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-2733-2019, 2019
Short summary
Impact of frontal ablation on the ice thickness estimation of marine-terminating glaciers in Alaska
Beatriz Recinos, Fabien Maussion, Timo Rothenpieler, and Ben Marzeion
The Cryosphere, 13, 2657–2672, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-2657-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-2657-2019, 2019
Short summary
Modeling the response of Greenland outlet glaciers to global warming using a coupled flow line–plume model
Johanna Beckmann, Mahé Perrette, Sebastian Beyer, Reinhard Calov, Matteo Willeit, and Andrey Ganopolski
The Cryosphere, 13, 2281–2301, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-2281-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-2281-2019, 2019
Short summary
Cited articles  
Anderson, B. M., Mackintosh, A. N., Stumm, D., George, L., Kerr, T., Winter-Billington, A., and Fitzsimons, S. J.: Climate sensitivity of a high-precipitation glacier in New Zealand, J. Glaciol., 56, 114–128, https://doi.org/10.3189/002214310791190929, 2010.
Anderton, P. W.: Tasman Glacier 1971-73, Hydrological Research: Annual Report 33., Published by the Ministry of Works and Development for the National Water and Soil Conservation Organization of New Zealand, 1975.
Andreassen, L. M., Paul, F., Kääb, A., and Hausberg, J. E.: Landsat-derived glacier inventory for Jotunheimen, Norway, and deduced glacier changes since the 1930s, The Cryosphere, 2, 131–145, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2-131-2008, 2008.
Andreassen, L. M., Huss, M., Melvold, K., Elvehøy, H., and Winsvold, S. H.: Ice thickness measurements and volume estimates for glaciers in Norway, J. Glaciol., 61, 763–775, https://doi.org/10.3189/2015JoG14J161, 2015.
Andreassen, L. M., Elvehøy, H., Kjøllmoen, B., and Engeset, R. V.: Reanalysis of long-term series of glaciological and geodetic mass balance for 10 Norwegian glaciers, The Cryosphere, 10, 535–552, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-535-2016, 2016.
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
ITMIX – the Ice Thickness Models Intercomparison eXperiment – was the first coordinated performance assessment for models inferring glacier ice thickness from surface characteristics. Considering 17 different models and 21 different test cases, we show that although solutions of individual models can differ considerably, an ensemble average can yield uncertainties in the order of 10 ± 24 % the mean ice thickness. Ways forward for improving such estimates are sketched.
ITMIX – the Ice Thickness Models Intercomparison eXperiment – was the first coordinated...
Citation