Articles | Volume 11, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-989-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-11-989-2017
Research article
 | Highlight paper
 | 
20 Apr 2017
Research article | Highlight paper |  | 20 Apr 2017

Process-level model evaluation: a snow and heat transfer metric

Andrew G. Slater, David M. Lawrence, and Charles D. Koven

Related authors

Accurate assessment of land–atmosphere coupling in climate models requires high-frequency data output
Kirsten L. Findell, Zun Yin, Eunkyo Seo, Paul A. Dirmeyer, Nathan P. Arnold, Nathaniel Chaney, Megan D. Fowler, Meng Huang, David M. Lawrence, Po-Lun Ma, and Joseph A. Santanello Jr.
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1869–1883, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1869-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1869-2024, 2024
Short summary
A new process-based and scale-aware desert dust emission scheme for global climate models – Part II: Evaluation in the Community Earth System Model version 2 (CESM2)
Danny M. Leung, Jasper F. Kok, Longlei Li, Natalie M. Mahowald, David M. Lawrence, Simone Tilmes, Erik Kluzek, Martina Klose, and Carlos Pérez García-Pando
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 2287–2318, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-2287-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-2287-2024, 2024
Short summary
On the predictability of turbulent fluxes from land: PLUMBER2 MIP experimental description and preliminary results
Gab Abramowitz, Anna Ukkola, Sanaa Hobeichi, Jon Cranko Page, Mathew Lipson, Martin De Kauwe, Sam Green, Claire Brenner, Jonathan Frame, Grey Nearing, Martyn Clark, Martin Best, Peter Anthoni, Gabriele Arduini, Souhail Boussetta, Silvia Caldararu, Kyeungwoo Cho, Matthias Cuntz, David Fairbairn, Craig Ferguson, Hyungjun Kim, Yeonjoo Kim, Jürgen Knauer, David Lawrence, Xiangzhong Luo, Sergey Malyshev, Tomoko Nitta, Jerome Ogee, Keith Oleson, Catherine Ottlé, Phillipe Peylin, Patricia de Rosnay, Heather Rumbold, Bob Su, Nicolas Vuichard, Anthony Walker, Xiaoni Wang-Faivre, Yunfei Wang, and Yijian Zeng
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-3084,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-3084, 2024
Short summary
Exploring the decision-making process in model development: focus on the Arctic snowpack
Cecile B. Menard, Sirpa Rasmus, Ioanna Merkouriadi, Gianpaolo Balsamo, Annett Bartsch, Chris Derksen, Florent Domine, Marie Dumont, Dorothee Ehrich, Richard Essery, Bruce C. Forbes, Gerhard Krinner, David Lawrence, Glen Liston, Heidrun Matthes, Nick Rutter, Melody Sandells, Martin Schneebeli, and Sari Stark
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2926,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2926, 2024
Short summary
Dynamic ecosystem assembly and escaping the “fire-trap” in the tropics: Insights from FATES_15.0.0
Jacquelyn K. Shuman, Rosie A. Fisher, Charles D. Koven, Ryan G. Knox, Lara M. Kueppers, and Chonggang Xu
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-191,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2023-191, 2023
Revised manuscript under review for GMD
Short summary

Related subject area

Snow Physics
Spatial distribution of vertical density and microstructure profiles in near-surface firn around Dome Fuji, Antarctica
Ryo Inoue, Shuji Fujita, Kenji Kawamura, Ikumi Oyabu, Fumio Nakazawa, Hideaki Motoyama, and Teruo Aoki
The Cryosphere, 18, 425–449, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-425-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-425-2024, 2024
Short summary
Seismic attenuation in Antarctic firn
Stefano Picotti, José M. Carcione, and Mauro Pavan
The Cryosphere, 18, 169–186, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-169-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-169-2024, 2024
Short summary
Temporospatial variability of snow's thermal conductivity on Arctic sea ice
Amy R. Macfarlane, Henning Löwe, Lucille Gimenes, David N. Wagner, Ruzica Dadic, Rafael Ottersberg, Stefan Hämmerle, and Martin Schneebeli
The Cryosphere, 17, 5417–5434, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-5417-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-5417-2023, 2023
Short summary
A rigorous approach to the specific surface area evolution in snow during temperature gradient metamorphism
Anna Braun, Kévin Fourteau, and Henning Löwe
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1947,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1947, 2023
Short summary
Heterogeneous grain growth and vertical mass transfer within a snow layer under a temperature gradient
Lisa Bouvet, Neige Calonne, Frédéric Flin, and Christian Geindreau
The Cryosphere, 17, 3553–3573, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-3553-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-3553-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Abramowitz, G., Leuning, R., Clark, M., and Pitman, A.: Evaluating the Performance of Land Surface Models, J. Clim., 21, 5468–5481, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2378.1, 2008.
Anisimov, O. A., Lobanov, V. A., Reneva, S. A., Shiklomanov, N. I., Zhang, T., and Nelson, F. E.: Uncertainties in gridded air temperature fields and effects on predictive active layer modeling, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth Surf., 112, F02S14, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JF000593, 2007.
Best, M. J., Pryor, M., Clark, D. B., Rooney, G. G., Essery, R. L. H., Ménard, C. B., Edwards, J. M., Hendry, M. A., Porson, A., Gedney, N., Mercado, L. M., Sitch, S., Blyth, E., Boucher, O., Cox, P. M., Grimmond, C. S. B., and Harding, R. J.: The Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES), model description – Part 1: Energy and water fluxes, Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 677–699, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-677-2011, 2011.
Brown, R. and Brasnett, B.: Canadian Meteorological Centre (CMC) Daily Snow Depth Analysis Data. ©Environment Canada, 2010, Boulder, Colorado USA: National Snow and Ice Data Center, Digital media, 2010.
Chadburn, S. E., Burke, E. J., Essery, R. L. H., Boike, J., Langer, M., Heikenfeld, M., Cox, P. M., and Friedlingstein, P.: Impact of model developments on present and future simulations of permafrost in a global land-surface model, The Cryosphere, 9, 1505–1521, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-1505-2015, 2015.
Download
Short summary
This work defines a metric for evaluation of a specific model snow process, namely, heat transfer through snow into soil. Heat transfer through snow regulates the difference in air temperature versus soil temperature. Accurate representation of the snow heat transfer process is critically important for accurate representation of the current and future state of permafrost. Utilizing this metric, we can clearly identify models that can and cannot reasonably represent snow heat transfer.