Assessment of contemporary satellite sea ice thickness products for Arctic sea ice

Sallila, Heidi; Farrell, Sinéad Louise; McCurry, Joshua; Rinne, Eero

doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-1187-2019

Articles | Volume 13, issue 4

https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-1187-2019

© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-1187-2019

© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Articles | Volume 13, issue 4

Research article

|

12 Apr 2019

Research article |

| 12 Apr 2019

Assessment of contemporary satellite sea ice thickness products for Arctic sea ice

Heidi Sallila, Sinéad Louise Farrell, Joshua McCurry, and Eero Rinne

Download

Final revised paper (published on 12 Apr 2019)
Supplement to the final revised paper
Preprint (discussion started on 24 Sep 2018)
Supplement to the preprint

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment

- Printer-friendly version

- Supplement

SC1: 'Potential issue in Figure 5', Stefan Hendricks, 26 Sep 2018
- SC2: 'Also noted for the GSFC product', Nathan Kurtz, 26 Sep 2018
  - AC4: 'Response to SC2', Heidi Sallila, 01 Feb 2019
- AC3: 'Response to SC1', Heidi Sallila, 30 Jan 2019
SC3: 'CPOM website url does not work', Nic Wayand, 27 Sep 2018
- SC4: 'UCL website', Eero Rinne, 10 Oct 2018
  - AC2: 'Response to SC4', Heidi Sallila, 30 Jan 2019
- AC1: 'Response to SC3', Heidi Sallila, 30 Jan 2019
RC1: 'Review for The Cryosphere Discuss. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2018-197', Jack Landy, 09 Oct 2018
- AC7: 'Response to RC1', Heidi Sallila, 20 Mar 2019
RC2: 'Review of "Assessment of Contemporary Satellite Sea Ice Thickness Products of Arctic Sea ice" by Sallila et al.', Thomas Armitage, 17 Oct 2018
- AC6: 'Response to RC2', Heidi Sallila, 19 Mar 2019
RC3: 'Review of "Assessment of Contemporary Satellite Sea Ice Thickness Products for Arctic Sea Ice" by Sallila et al.', Robert Ricker, 04 Nov 2018
- AC5: 'Response to RC3', Heidi Sallila, 19 Mar 2019
AC8: 'Response to RC1, RC2 and RC3 - manuscript with review edits', Heidi Sallila, 21 Mar 2019

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision

AR by Anna Wenzel on behalf of the Authors (27 Mar 2019) Author's response Manuscript

ED: Publish as is (27 Mar 2019) by John Yackel

Short summary

We assess 8 years of sea ice thickness observations derived from measurements of CryoSat-2 (CS2), AVHRR and SMOS satellites, collating key details of primary interest to users. We find a number of differences among data products but find that CS2 measurements are reliable for sea ice thickness, particularly between ~ 0.5 and 4 m. Regional comparisons reveal noticeable differences in ice thickness between products, particularly in the marginal seas in areas of considerable ship traffic.