Journal cover Journal topic
The Cryosphere An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 4.790 IF 4.790
  • IF 5-year value: 5.921 IF 5-year
    5.921
  • CiteScore value: 5.27 CiteScore
    5.27
  • SNIP value: 1.551 SNIP 1.551
  • IPP value: 5.08 IPP 5.08
  • SJR value: 3.016 SJR 3.016
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 63 Scimago H
    index 63
  • h5-index value: 51 h5-index 51
TC | Volume 13, issue 2
The Cryosphere, 13, 469–489, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-469-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
The Cryosphere, 13, 469–489, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-469-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Research article 08 Feb 2019

Research article | 08 Feb 2019

Robust uncertainty assessment of the spatio-temporal transferability of glacier mass and energy balance models

Tobias Zolles et al.

Related authors

GrSMBMIP: Intercomparison of the modelled 1980–2012 surface mass balance over the Greenland Ice sheet
Xavier Fettweis, Stefan Hofer, Uta Krebs-Kanzow, Charles Amory, Teruo Aoki, Constantijn J. Berends, Andreas Born, Jason E. Box, Alison Delhasse, Koji Fujita, Paul Gierz, Heiko Goelzer, Edward Hanna, Akihiro Hashimoto, Philippe Huybrechts, Marie-Luise Kapsch, Michalea D. King, Christoph Kittel, Charlotte Lang, Peter L. Langen, Jan T. M. Lenaerts, Glen E. Liston, Gerrit Lohmann, Sebastian H. Mernild, Uwe Mikolajewicz, Kameswarrao Modali, Ruth H. Mottram, Masashi Niwano, Brice Noël, Jonathan C. Ryan, Amy Smith, Jan Streffing, Marco Tedesco, Willem Jan van de Berg, Michiel van den Broeke, Roderik S. W. van de Wal, Leo van Kampenhout, David Wilton, Bert Wouters, Florian Ziemen, and Tobias Zolles
The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2019-321,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2019-321, 2020
Preprint under review for TC
Short summary
Sensitivity of the Greenland mass and energy balance to uncertainties in key model parameters
Tobias Zolles and Andreas Born
The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2019-251,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2019-251, 2019
Preprint under review for TC
Short summary

Related subject area

Discipline: Glaciers | Subject: Alpine Glaciers
Supra-glacial debris cover changes in the Greater Caucasus from 1986 to 2014
Levan G. Tielidze, Tobias Bolch, Roger D. Wheate, Stanislav S. Kutuzov, Ivan I. Lavrentiev, and Michael Zemp
The Cryosphere, 14, 585–598, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-585-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-585-2020, 2020
Short summary
Spatial and temporal variations in glacier surface roughness during melting season, as observed at August-one glacier, Qilian mountains, China
Junfeng Liu, Rensheng Chen, and Chuntan Han
The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2019-186,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2019-186, 2019
Revised manuscript accepted for TC
Short summary
Strong changes in englacial temperatures despite insignificantchanges in ice thickness at Dôme du Goûter glacier (Mont-Blanc area)
Christian Vincent, Adrien Gilbert, Bruno Jourdain, Luc Piard, Patrick Ginot, Vladimir Mikhalenko, Philippe Possenti, Emmanuel Le Meur, Olivier Laarman, and Delphine Six
The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2019-158,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2019-158, 2019
Revised manuscript accepted for TC
Short summary
Glacier thickness estimations of alpine glaciers using data and modeling constraints
Lisbeth Langhammer, Melchior Grab, Andreas Bauder, and Hansruedi Maurer
The Cryosphere, 13, 2189–2202, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-2189-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-2189-2019, 2019
Short summary
Unravelling the evolution of Zmuttgletscher and its debris cover since the end of the Little Ice Age
Nico Mölg, Tobias Bolch, Andrea Walter, and Andreas Vieli
The Cryosphere, 13, 1889–1909, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-1889-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-1889-2019, 2019
Short summary

Cited articles

Anslow, F. S., Hostetler, S., Bidlake, W. R., and Clark, P. U.: Distributed energy balance modeling of South Cascade Glacier, Washington and assessment of model uncertainty, J. Geophys. Res.-Earth, 113, 1–18, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JF000850, 2008. a
Beven, K.: Changing ideas in hydrology - The case of physically-based models, J. Hydrol., 105, 157–172, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(89)90101-7, 1989. a
Beven, K. and Binley, A.: The Future of Distributed Models: Model Calibration and Uncertainity Prediction, Hydrol. Process., 6, 279–298, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360060305, 1992. a
Bintanja, R. and Van Den Broeke, M.: The surface energy balance of antartic snow and blue ice, J. Appl. Meteorol., 34, 902–926, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1995)034<0902:TSEBOA>2.0.CO;2, 1995. a, b
Braithwaite, R. J.: Aerodynatnic stability and turbulent sensible-heat flux over a melting ice surface, the Greenland ice sheet, J. Glaciol., 41, 562–571, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022143000034882, 1995. a
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
A mass and energy balance model was subjected to sensitivity and uncertainty analysis on two different Alpine glaciers. The global sensitivity analysis allowed for a mass balance measurement independent assessment of the model sensitivity and functioned as a reduction of the model free parameter space. A novel approach of a multi-objective optimization estimates the uncertainty of the simulated mass balance and the energy fluxes. The final model uncertainty is up to 1300 kg m−3 per year.
A mass and energy balance model was subjected to sensitivity and uncertainty analysis on two...
Citation