Articles | Volume 14, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-1289-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-1289-2020
Research article
 | 
21 Apr 2020
Research article |  | 21 Apr 2020

Accuracy and inter-analyst agreement of visually estimated sea ice concentrations in Canadian Ice Service ice charts using single-polarization RADARSAT-2

Angela Cheng, Barbara Casati, Adrienne Tivy, Tom Zagon, Jean-François Lemieux, and L. Bruno Tremblay

Related authors

Using Icepack to reproduce ice mass balance buoy observations in landfast ice: improvements from the mushy-layer thermodynamics
Mathieu Plante, Jean-François Lemieux, L. Bruno Tremblay, Adrienne Tivy, Joey Angnatok, François Roy, Gregory Smith, Frédéric Dupont, and Adrian K. Turner
The Cryosphere, 18, 1685–1708, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-1685-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-1685-2024, 2024
Short summary
Smoothed particle hydrodynamics implementation of the standard viscous–plastic sea-ice model and validation in simple idealized experiments
Oreste Marquis, Bruno Tremblay, Jean-François Lemieux, and Mohammed Islam
The Cryosphere, 18, 1013–1032, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-1013-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-1013-2024, 2024
Short summary
The YOPP site Model Intercomparison Project (YOPPsiteMIP) phase 1: project overview and Arctic winter forecast evaluation
Jonathan Day, Gunilla Svensson, Barbara Casati, Taniel Uttal, Siri-Jodha Khalsa, Eric Bazile, Elena Akish, Niramson Azouz, Lara Ferrighi, Helmut Frank, Michael Gallagher, Øystein Godøy, Leslie Hartten, Laura X. Huang, Jareth Holt, Massimo Di Stefano, Irene Suomi, Zen Mariani, Sara Morris, Ewan O'Connor, Roberta Pirazzini, Teresa Remes, Rostislav Fadeev, Amy Solomon, Johanna Tjernström, and Mikhail Tolstykh
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1951,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1951, 2023
Short summary
Merged Observatory Data Files (MODFs): An Integrated Observational Data Product Supporting Process-Oriented Investigations and Diagnostics
Taneil Uttal, Leslie M. Hartten, Siri Jodha Khalsa, Barbara Casati, Gunilla Svensson, Jonathan Day, Jareth Holt, Elena Akish, Sara Morris, Ewan O'Connor, Roberta Pirazzini, Laura X. Huang, Robert Crawford, Zen Mariani, Øystein Godøy, Johanna A. K. Tjernström, Giri Prakash, Nicki Hickmon, Marion Maturilli, and Christopher J. Cox
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2413,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2413, 2023
Short summary
Damaging viscous-plastic sea ice
Antoine Savard and Bruno Tremblay
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1354,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1354, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Discipline: Sea ice | Subject: Sea Ice
Why is summertime Arctic sea ice drift speed projected to decrease?
Jamie L. Ward and Neil F. Tandon
The Cryosphere, 18, 995–1012, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-995-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-995-2024, 2024
Short summary
Impact of atmospheric rivers on Arctic sea ice variations
Linghan Li, Forest Cannon, Matthew R. Mazloff, Aneesh C. Subramanian, Anna M. Wilson, and Fred Martin Ralph
The Cryosphere, 18, 121–137, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-121-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-121-2024, 2024
Short summary
The impacts of anomalies in atmospheric circulations on Arctic sea ice outflow and sea ice conditions in the Barents and Greenland seas: case study in 2020
Fanyi Zhang, Ruibo Lei, Mengxi Zhai, Xiaoping Pang, and Na Li
The Cryosphere, 17, 4609–4628, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-4609-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-4609-2023, 2023
Short summary
A large-scale high-resolution numerical model for sea-ice fragmentation dynamics
Jan Åström, Jari Haapala, and Arttu Polojärvi
The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2023-97,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2023-97, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for TC
Short summary
Atmospheric highs drive asymmetric sea ice drift during lead opening from Point Barrow
MacKenzie E. Jewell, Jennifer K. Hutchings, and Cathleen A. Geiger
The Cryosphere, 17, 3229–3250, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-3229-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-3229-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Belchansky, G. I. and Douglas, D. C.: Seasonal comparisons of sea ice concentration estimates derived from SSM/I, OKEAN, and RADARSAT data, Remote Sens. Environ., 81, 67–81, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00333-9, 2002. a
Canadian Ice Service: Manual of Ice (MANICE), available at: https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/weather-manuals-documentation/manice-manual-of-ice/chapter-3.html#Egg, last access: 31 October 2019. a
Clausi, D. A., Qin, A. K., Chowdhury, M. S., Yu, P., and Maillard, P.: MAGIC: MAp-Guided Ice Classification System, Can. J. Remote Sens., 36, S13–S25, https://doi.org/10.5589/m10-008, 2010. a
Dedrick, K., Partington, K., Woert, M. V., Bertoia, C., and Benner, D.: U.S. National/Naval Ice Center Digital Sea Ice Data and Climatology, Can. J. Remote Sens., 27, 457–475, https://doi.org/10.1080/07038992.2001.10854887, 2001. a
Hallgren, K. A.: Computing Inter-Rater Reliability for Observational Data: An Overview and Tutorial, Tutorials in quantitative methods for psychology, 8, 23–34, 2012. a
Download
Short summary
Sea ice charts by the Canadian Ice Service (CIS) contain visually estimated ice concentration produced by analysts. The accuracy of manually derived ice concentrations is not well understood. The subsequent uncertainty of ice charts results in downstream uncertainties for ice charts users, such as models and climatology studies, and when used as a verification source for automated sea ice classifiers. This study quantifies the level of accuracy and inter-analyst agreement for ice charts by CIS.