Journal cover Journal topic
The Cryosphere An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 5.516 IF 5.516
  • IF 5-year<br/> value: 5.591 IF 5-year
  • SNIP value: 1.589 SNIP 1.589
  • IPP value: 5.158 IPP 5.158
  • SJR value: 3.518 SJR 3.518
  • h5-index value: 41 h5-index 41
The Cryosphere, 4, 35-51, 2010
© Author(s) 2010. This work is distributed
under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
21 Jan 2010
Simulation of the specific surface area of snow using a one-dimensional physical snowpack model: implementation and evaluation for subarctic snow in Alaska
H.-W. Jacobi1, F. Domine1, W. R. Simpson2, T. A. Douglas3, and M. Sturm3
1CNRS/Université Joseph Fourier – Grenoble 1, Laboratoire de Glaciologie et Géophysique de l'Environnement, St. Martin d'Hères, France
2Geophysical Institute and Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Alaska
3US Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Fort Wainwright, Alaska

Abstract. The specific surface area (SSA) of the snow constitutes a powerful parameter to quantify the exchange of matter and energy between the snow and the atmosphere. However, currently no snow physics model can simulate the SSA. Therefore, two different types of empirical parameterizations of the specific surface area (SSA) of snow are implemented into the existing one-dimensional snow physics model CROCUS. The parameterizations are either based on diagnostic equations relating the SSA to parameters like snow type and density or on prognostic equations that describe the change of SSA depending on snow age, snowpack temperature, and the temperature gradient within the snowpack. Simulations with the upgraded CROCUS model were performed for a subarctic snowpack, for which an extensive data set including SSA measurements is available at Fairbanks, Alaska for the winter season 2003/2004. While a reasonable agreement between simulated and observed SSA values is obtained using both parameterizations, the model tends to overestimate the SSA. This overestimation is more pronounced using the diagnostic equations compared to the results of the prognostic equations. Parts of the SSA deviations using both parameterizations can be attributed to differences between simulated and observed snow heights, densities, and temperatures. Therefore, further sensitivity studies regarding the thermal budget of the snowpack were performed. They revealed that reducing the thermal conductivity of the snow or increasing the turbulent fluxes at the snow surfaces leads to a slight improvement of the simulated thermal budget of the snowpack compared to the observations. However, their impact on further simulated parameters like snow height and SSA remains small. Including additional physical processes in the snow model may have the potential to advance the simulations of the thermal budget of the snowpack and, thus, the SSA simulations.

Citation: Jacobi, H.-W., Domine, F., Simpson, W. R., Douglas, T. A., and Sturm, M.: Simulation of the specific surface area of snow using a one-dimensional physical snowpack model: implementation and evaluation for subarctic snow in Alaska, The Cryosphere, 4, 35-51, doi:10.5194/tc-4-35-2010, 2010.
Search TC
Final Revised Paper
Discussion Paper